What About Agile
I am big fan of Dilbert.
My trouble lately (several years to be specific) is agile. I have no trouble with methodology itself, but the way it is used. I struggled around till I saw this:
I did small research – talked to people and by the way asked about their info source on the subject. Some of business people really said that they have no idea what it is, but they learned that that’s the thing what sells. Agile is new sexy!
I start to think, how could I explain in small talk, how I understand agile and why it is worth to get to know more about it. Trade magazines often points out the speed as a key value, but never tells you how to get the speed. By pushing just accelerator you will not make very far on bend and bumpy road.
So let’s go back to the basics. First value on agile manifesto says:
Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
Fifth principle of agile manifesto:
Build projects around motivated individuals.
Give them the environment and support they need,
and trust them to get the job done.
Individuals, motivated individuals… and trust them! How about that?! The trust. Whom do you trust?
I did small survey (that’s the thing I always do if I am on something) and got shocking answers. My responders do not trust their colleagues and will not address the issue, no matter that they agreed that trust among the colleagues is very important.
As more as I think about the trust as much, I think that may be it is the source of my struggle. Current society are so focused on career and success that we forget about individuals and trust at a workspace. This project is just a step to next big thing.
As a tester I wonder quite a lot about things, what I thought is common sense, but turned out that it is just my sense and I have to explain it to others or write a bug report :) . I think that trust among colleagues is nothing agile-unique. And also satisfied customers and working software should not be something extraordinary – isn’t it something “by default”? Why we need manifesto for that? And if someone wrote manifesto for all that, why do we grade it by doing not properly?